- Image via Wikipedia
At first reading, Shearer’s observations may seem a tad reductive; the article is general in its comparisons, and makes no reference to the structural differences between American and British societies and their press industries which may account for why “more” might be “better” for the British but could be a waste of ink for the Americans. On the other hand, comparisons are more often than not based on general themes and visual indications. The fact that publishers are prepared to continue pooling resources into extensive weekend packages and investigative campaigns, moreover, is a good indication as any of the health of British papers. The British press, despite the range of standards within the industry, remains a pertinent synecdoche to illustrate its continued existence as a cherished, albeit currently beleaguered, national institution.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://i0.wp.com/img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png)