How (and why) to replace the AP « BuzzMachine

we come back to the gigantic wind-down costs that would entail, getting rid of parts of the operation that aren’t needed anymore. And that’s the problem: much of it isn’t needed anymore. Just ask the many newspapers that are canceling the service along with their $1-million-a-year bills. (See the Star-Ledger that was produced with a single AP pixel.)

Jarvis on link economy, reverse syndication, and why it is so expensive to try and remake old media into new.

Posted via web from Noteoreous | Comment »